
Let me tell you a story about a document, a document called an Education and Health Care Plan (EHCP)…
There was a time in my life that I had very limited knowledge of these documents, they were letters mentioned in meetings. Letters that had no direct relationship to my reason for being there.
When Charlie developed additional needs that changed, suddenly EHCP’s were mentioned in relation to my child, that relationship had changed and so too must my level of knowledge.
As a parent, understanding the EHCP process and document is fraught with difficulty. It often feels like it’s a club they purposefully lock you out of.
People rarely want to answer your questions, there are very few courses available that adequately explain the document.
A massive focus is placed on trust, trust that the document delivers what it’s supposed to, that the allocated funding is adequate to meet need.

The premise of an EHCP is a simple one, it is supposed to be the story of your child. Our portage worker said it would be a guide to Charlie where all of his history and needs, both educationally and medically, would be written down.
It is intended to ensure that his needs are met, that he is safe, and that he is able to access Education in a way that suits him. In theory it’s a clever document.
It isn’t easy to get an EHCP, there’s evidence gathering and form filling to be done. That is then looked at and a decision is made as to if your child warrants further assessment.
The further assessment takes 20 weeks (sometimes longer) and it is suggested this period of time is needed to seek professional advice and ensure all the child’s needs are identified.
At the end of this long and emotive period you sit at an outcomes meeting and are told if the local authority will issue or not.
I cried at our outcomes meeting. When we were told he was to be awarded a plan relief flowed from me. The naive, new to the SEN world, me thought we’d secured his future.
I thought that with that document he would be safe, he would be supervised, and he would be supported.
There was so much I didn’t understand, so much trust that was broken.
I naively believed that as the educational psychologist report, commissioned by the LA said “no less than 100% 1-1 supervision in any setting” that this is what he would receive. I believed that the funding, which was in no way transparent, would meet his complex needs…
I was wrong.
The plan said “adequate access to 1:1” and I believed, given the EP report which they had commissioned, that they understood adequate was “full time” and no less. That was not the case.
I assumed the funding would cover the cost of this care, it did not.
I also believed the plan would be overseen, that the care and progress would be checked. It was not.
Eventually the full facts of what had been happening to my vulnerable, non verbal, child became apparent. It was heartbreaking and the harm and emotional scars remain.
I was angry, I was let down, Charlie was neglected. People looked me square in the eye and told me that I was overreacting, that I was a problem.
I tried to get people to understand what was happening and it was like screaming into the dark night, it felt hopeless.
Eventually the funding was changed to meet his needs and a change of settings saw a profound change in care and respect for Charlie.
We were relieved, but always wary. Once you have had your trust abused you never forget.
One issue remained, the need for constant 1:1 at school was not explicitly stated in his plan and while he receives this from his brilliant school we needed to know it would continue.
Last year at the review of his plan, some things were questioned including the removal of specified funding amounts.
I was assured this was going to be standard practice and was told this wouldn’t affect his provision. Our experiences told us this was not our reality.
I sent fraught emails until my concerns landed with the manager, she again tried to tell me it was fine. I explained all the reasons it wasn’t and that his care needs were not explicitly stated in his plan and this was an issue to me.
She said any professional recommendations most certainly should be in his plan, I explained again they weren’t and that I kept trying to explain this to people.
I explained how lucky we were that school recognised his needs but I wanted it formally acknowledged in his plan.
That would be the only way I would feel comfortable with the removal of the funding amounts.
Then a wonderful thing happened, she said she would look for the relevant documents and review his plan. She said someone would come back to me, and I held my breath until they did.
Finally I got an answer, finally my belief was validated. I received an email that said his case worker and the manager had reviewed his file and that, as a result of this specific information, information would be added into the section stating the provision required.
My heart raced as I read “A high level of adult support and monitoring throughout sessions in setting. One to one support for a minimum of 100% of time in setting to ensure maximum access to learning environment and safety”.
This is what I had been fighting for, this is what I had been trying to explain, this recognition of his needs was all I wanted.
Now I feel both elated and sad. I’m beyond happy that they agreed to this, that the plan was changed, the school was funded appropriately and Charlie will remained safe and happy.
I’m also sad, sad for all he experienced and sad for how long it took people to acknowledge the importance of those few sentences.
Those sentences, that should have been there all along, would have saved him from all the lack of supervision and mental trauma he experienced, not to mention the impact on his already delayed development.
An individual was able to treat him that way because “legally” he could and that breaks my heart.

This year his review highlighted further issues, no significant changes have been made to his targets or needs in four years, other than the addition of the 100% 1-1 last year’s plan nothing has changed.
In four years he hasn’t achieved the targets set when he was two, his needs have changed, new diagnoses have joined the party that make these targets all wrong for him.
It is not a plan that will support him or the school. The school submitted comments stating it needs to be rewritten.
His review happened in April, it’s been a stressful time of uncertainty. Finally weeks after the review and an initial decision to reissue the plan unchanged, we had agreement to amend the plan.
The school year has now finished, the level of communication is poor. Charlie still does not have an agreed plan, I cannot get clear answers to any questions.
He has no school named on his draft, the school have not been communicated with. The school we want him to remain at.
The so called “experts” are placing the responsibility for an adequate plan squarely at my door again. I don’t know how to write an EHCP!
I have been asked to prove diagnoses that have already been referred into the specialist inclusion team, I am drained.
It shouldn’t be this hard to have your child’s needs correctly acknowledged, it shouldn’t rely on the moral compass of those around the child to ensure they are cared for correctly.
With the right care and support Charlie is capable of amazing things, the last year alone has been testament to this. His achievements look different but they are still clear to see.

In theory the EHCP is a positive thing, the people who write and manage them need to understand what they really mean though.
While they continue to see them as a “cost” and a means to an end, while they continually fail to see the children behind these words and recommendations, they will not fulfil their purpose.
It shouldn’t be this hard for parents to navigate this system or to be heard. It certainly shouldn’t be so hard for the Child at the centre of these plans to have their needs seen and correctly supported.
So today I’m grateful to the people that listen, there are no words to express my gratitude, but I’m sad for all the times I am dismissed and made to feel I imagine his level of need. I’m sad to have been made to feel like a dramatic and needy parent.
So now I will continue to question and chase. I will remain nervous until his school is once again added as his placement. Due to previous experiences I am worried. Yesterday I paid his school milk bill for the year and then worried in case he wasn’t allowed to stay.
It shouldn’t be like this…
As a parent we know what is right and I’m proud that I will never give up fighting for Charlie’s needs to be correctly acknowledged.
The absolute truth is though, it shouldn’t be a fight…

Some things are worth the fight.


























